Intelligent Design The Future

Reviews For Intelligent Design The Future

1/5

Just more non-scientific blather. Irreducible complexity does not exist in biological systems and DNA is not a computer code.
This is so needed and I’m really enjoying thus podcast. However I’m hoping that they will dive deeper into the science and details of their findings and opinions as well. It would make this podcast even better!
I enjoy listening to podcasts as I work around the house and in the yard and I find this one to consistently have amazing guests and content. My mind is continually being fed with new research and discoveries via the Discovery Institute. This is the most interesting and invaluable podcast on my downloads.
Really appreciate the guests and content on this podcast. I would agree with some of the other reviewers though that the sound quality ranges from fair to poor. Some at least occasionally longer episodes would be nice. And sometimes the interviewer takes unwarranted jabs at the other side. Great otherwise though.

5/5

By ricb2
These guys are great!
I’m a huge fan and rarely miss an rpisode.
As a fellow ID champion and a sound engineer I’m disappointed in the poor sound quality. The content is awesome, the guest compelling, however the host sounds like he’s reading a first year interns interview questions from the shower. The world is watching AND LISTENING we need to do better.
My biggest problem with this podcast is the length. These episodes being only 15 minutes long, on average, don’t allow for a very thorough treatment of the topic. Barely any follow-up questions, back and forth, or push-back. It leaves me wanting more, in a bad way.
Don’t listen to the detractors and trolls. This podcast is an excellent database with fascinating interviews coupled with current science.
Excellent podcast series for serious seekers of truth.
Great interview that gets to the point and explains it every day language.
Thank you for excellent podcast
Great information and interviews help flesh out what is happening in ID. Keep up the great content!
They present things with no science to back it up, just a few studies that have been debunked, science is a brutal competition for scientists, these people don’t have Anything that would survive in scientific academia and then they cry conspiracy, give it up evaluation is the truth just except it please!
I am interested in what other people have say on the subject, but there needs to be better audio control or a lot of people will be turned off to a poor sounding show.
Timmy — You are Exhibit A in the proof of value of the IDTF podcast. FWIW, when you are making vague ad hominem arguments supposedly about science, at least use proper English grammar and try to avoid conflating the singular and plural in the same sentence.
Please stop proliferating this garbage. As a Christian we all need to stop believing this obscene defamation of science.
Those that argue that intelligent design is a religious argument are simply misinformed and intellectually dishonest at best. Most opponents and anti-ID folks will not even look at the studies and evidence that runs contrary to their personal beliefs. That’s your run of the mill Darwinist today. Dogma is dogma in any generation. We just replaced creationists dogma with Darwinian dogma. Neither is correct. ID brings something new and compelling to the subject of the origin of species and it should be looked at critically and honestly and wholesomely.
Great podcast! I’m surprised I haven’t found this before now.
If you can maintian some objectivity and would actually like to learn something about biology, then tune in. If you're a big fan of Materialist just-so stories, then there's nothing for you here. Maybe go read some Kipling, one-star reviewers.
The scornful prior reviewer was of course correct, Darwin did provide evidence based on the science of his time, Of course in a world of nano intercellular machines and the elucidation of DNA/protein synthesis it is almost all quite incorrect and outdated. I like the podcast, it keeps me thinking in scientific terms and not antiquated materialistic dogma.
Very informative, and it's terrific to hear some of your favorite ID authors and know the fight is still very much alive.
I teach critical thinking. I value opinions from a position I don't hold. But today, I just can't continue listening to this mendacious podcast. Here is the quote that ended my hope for any honest content from the bulk of the participants. "He [Darwin] actually prevailed, not because of his science, but because he provided a materialistic creation story that suited the temper of the times in the 19 century. He did not provide evidence for his theory as it turns out." --Jonathan Wells Intelligent Design The Future podcast April 27, 2017 That's right. Darwin provided no evidence for his theory this frequent guest on the podcast claims. The site had been a bit more than a source of logical fallacies I can teach to my students in that its discussion of the demarcation in science had some merit. But today it stepped beyond my threshold of tolerance for nonsense. Darwin provided no evidence for his theory? Simply unbelievable and worthy of the utmost scorn.
I so appreciate the devotion of Discovery Institute to the science in the face of constant criticism by those who simply are not open because of their pre-commitments to materialism. Agree or not, this is admirable scholarship, worthy of consideration. Keep up the great work, IDTF team!
No religion here. Science. Factual. Evidence-based. Thought provoking. Scientists speaking out on a wide range of subjects pertaining to intelligent design.
It's rare to hear such profoundly stupid arguments dressed up as logic and reason.
Pure and simple Bollox.
I wonder if the angry 1-star raters ever have orginal thoughts? You hate this show because you've been told how to think by poor science education on TV. If you actually listen to this show you might learn how to think for yourself, use skepticism, remember the scientific method? Science is not the popular opinion of well funded tax payer suported academics, use the brain God built for you.
Very helpful as a resource and source of encouragement.
Great stuff. Been a listener for about a year. I just wish Casey would speak slower. He talks so fast his words often roll over one another. And this comment comes from someone who works in New York City !
I am currently reading Stephen Meyer's book, Signature In The Cell, and man, it's awesome. I also think it's awesome to have this podcast available. Wished there were way more! Good stuff nonetheless! Haters are gonna always hate. But if one is honest in their pursuit of truth, this podcast will add to their plate:)

?
1/5

This podcast needs to be moved to the "religion" category.
I find it quite amusing how the atheists/evolutionists feel it necessary to spend their time putting a 1 star rating on podcasts they've never even listened to. This is yet another example of how the evolutionary community is adamently opposed to actually educating people and more interested in indoctrinating them. Heaven forbid that Galileo should have doubted the current paradigm of his time! HAHA! Today it's the ID community that is being censored by the atheist community. ID advocates....the modern day Galileo's.
I find it an interesting study to observe the typical pseudo-scientific attitude of those who denigrate ideas that they do not agree with as "not science". And, in nearly every case, they are doing so without actually deeply and personally investigating the issues for themselves. How long did it take you to decide that this was "not science"? Most likely the moment you heard it from one of your respected peers who gave you a brief explanation of why you should believe and repeat that Meme. And so, having accepted by faith a critique advanced using "ad hominem" and" genetic" logical fallacies, buttressed by the "argument from authority", you finish your descent into hypocritical ignorance making strawman arguments against the very thing you have become. Such people are what they create: strawmen
Intellectual design does not meet the criteria for science, which is methodology for explaining the natural world. ID is not reproducible in experiments, is not testable, is not falsifiable (meaning you cannot construct a test to see if it is or isn't supporting the hypothesis), etc etc. Believe what you want, but don't lie and call it a science.
Why is this podcast in the science section? This isn't science. This is religion trying to pretend to be science. On the upside though, the podcast are relatively short. Probably because they have no science to discuss. Hopefully this will be moved to the pseudoscience section.
At first glance this podcast seems to take a scientific look at the ID side of the debate, which is intriguing because no such argument has been honestly brought forward. However after listening to a few episodes it is clear that the same old, thoroughly refuted ID arguments are pres
The ideas and arguments are interesting and thought provoking. It's refreshing to hear well reasoned arguments for intelligent design. I would like to be persuaded. I'm not there yet. I'm still thinking about it.
This has become one of my favorite science based podcasts. Great topics, great hosts...
Fallacious & painfully shallow.
Perfect podcast to play the game " Name that logical Fallacy " ... For a better understanding of the arguments found in this podcast try listening to " The Skeptics Guide to the Universe "
If you're open to a reasoned discussion about the inference of design as observed in various scientific disciplines, this is a great place to begin.
I love this podcast. So glad I discovered it. Thanks for providing it. Why do the Darwinists get so mad I wonder. Even the co-discoverer of natural selection, Alfred Russel Wallace, couldn't ultimately join Darwin in his conclusions about the power of unguided natural selection to explain origins. And that was before we could really see the cell. I guess he wasn't a scientist? If you love life more than your philosophical allegiance to materialism you'll find out some wondrous things about it here.

:)
5/5

Most people who believe in evolution are brain washed.... It's 2012 let's start thinking for ourselves.
Awesome Information Informative Truthful science Thank you for the podcasts I'm learning so much
The evidence leads to evolution by natural selection not to a creator with magical powers...
The people in these podcasts are very earnest, polite, and completely unable to think rationally about this issue. They mean well, but wow. I'd flunk them.
People who don't agree with these ID ideas should give scientific reasons for not agreeing. Saying " it's not science " or curse words says nothing about the actual arguments being proposed. I hope people find actually scientific reasons to show how these view points may be wrong but nothing propose so far has injured the ID theory.
Don't pay attention to the very low ratings, this is a series of thoughtful podcasts. Those low raters want to shut down the debate, the don't want others to hear ideas that contradict their worldview. They will do the thinking for you and your job is to agree.