A police report was never filled against Faith! They called a tip line and left there own information. As lawyers why would you want to share false information? Faith doesn’t even no the facts of her own case!
It’s become boring and very late on current issues. I know they’re busy but it seems they’re too busy to keep up with the current news. It was fun at the start but now it’s a skip or a listen when I run out of shows
In the last episode Sandoval admits that he recorded Rachel without her consent at her apartment because he wanted her to know how “beautifully” she was. Did you not watch the show?! Why say “if”. Just watch it already!
It’s so weird how one of the hosts thought she was so right about how the girardi hearing and then seemingly won’t accept the court’s findings through the podcast. It’s such a weird take on the Tom girardi situation. Like she witnessed one day of testimony and won’t accept that what the court made its decision on is a wider set of evidence? It’s such a strange take from a barred attorney.
Love you guys but was frustrated by the recent pod guest Monica on the Girardi competency episode! The detailed discussion of the content and procedures of effort tests in the public domain is a huge threat to the integrity and validity of these tests for future use. The release of this type of info makes it easier for the public to manipulate the tests and lowers the overall validity of psychological assessments where they are needed. We have a finite number of quality PVTs at our disposal so protecting them by not airing this type of info in a public forum is so important!
I love the idea of this podcast and appreciate them going into details on this lawsuit, but the commentary can get a bit messy in a way that I find hard to listen to. The hosts regularly can’t remember the names of things and only sometimes look things up and mention the right name. I would prefer to not hear all of that as they can look up the correct term, restate what they were trying to say in a clear way, and cut out the confusion and guessing. They also seem to get confused about descriptions or what they’re reading and again the confusion could be cut. I would also prefer that they don’t make guesses at production or areas outside of their knowledge as either legal professionals or fans
I’m love how they breakdown the legal process/system/filings regarding pop culture cases. I learn so much about the legal process listening to this.
However many times Angela inserts her judgements into the podcast that doesn’t necessarily have legal implications. It can be confusing listening to her opinions and then try to decide if what she is saying has a bearing on the case they are discussing or if it is purely just her opinion.
I also find it off putting especially in the case regarding Caroline v Bravo. Ángela had a lot to say about how she felt that Brandie was guilty based only on ALLEGATIONS made by Caroline. As a practicing attorney, Angela should know that Brandie 1st is not being sued in this particular matter, and that there are two sides to the story. If Angela would like to say that she believes a certain allegation (as this is not the first time she has done this in the podcast) then she should have a segment about how she feels about the allegations with a disclaimer that what is in the filing is an allegation that has not been proven in court as of yet.
I think that, as many experts do, the ladies suffer from expert blindness. They may expect their listeners to have an understanding that their thoughts on allegations are just that, thoughts. I think they have to be very clear on that.
I love listening to them break down case filings/motions/judgements. I could do without the judgmental commentary that sometimes accompany the podcast.
This is such an important resource for bravo fans to have knowledgeable information about the legal issues on the shows. The ladies do a thorough job discussing and educating listeners.
Love drunk John and hearing Angela say "I'm cutting this out" every two minutes. Thank god she didn't cut anything out. This was hysterical and definitely sounded like me and my husband of we ever Podcasted together
Normally love the pod but cannot stand John and couldn’t get through the episode when he kept interrupting with his drunk misogyny. He makes me never want to get married. I just switched my dating apps to women only after 20 min of hearing him talk.
I love this podcast so much! It takes a different spin on bravo reality TV and has me laughing! The episode with John and the bourbon has to be my favorite this far! He needs to join more often 😂
They present the information in an easy digestible fun way. They also watch and are bravo fans, a lot of podcast on bravo legal issues don’t actually watch bravo.
This podcast is exactly what all Bravo fans want!!! I hope they continue to do this, sometimes it seems like there is some hostility between the two! We love you both!!
They do a fanatic job breaking down the legal jargon and relating it to the shows. They also both have very soothing voices. Lastly, you can tell they do fantastic prep and outlining for the episodes.
Hi, I just recently found y’all’s podcast and I love it!
I was hoping for a podcast on Project Runway. My daughter and I have watched it since the beginning.
Thanks for offering something different than the other thousands of podcasts! And I love knowing I’m not the only reality show fanatic☺️😉
Lisa
I absolutely adore this podcast. The hosts are incredibly intelligent and explain the legal issues of reality stars to us plebes so we can understand it. I am so glad they got together and made this podcast!
Cesie and Angela are the best! This is one of my favorite podcasts ever. These episodes are so well researched and always honest, fair, and super educational. Cesie and Angela are also a huge inspiration to me as a reminder that my “basic” interests are valid, especially the ones that are trivialized (like reality TV :) )
This is the most informative, fact based, intelligent podcast that I listen to. Thanks for all the work you both do to help us understand the technical and legalese type information on all these complicated cases. Recently, I really appreciate hearing your origin stories! Keep up the amazing work!
As a psychiatric nurse practitioner I throughly enjoy hearing an attorney’s perspective on the legal drama within the Bravo world since I’m making my own opinions on the casts. You both are so intelligent & speak with such ease! Keep the podcast going, it’s my fave out of all the bravo podcasts :) I feel like I’m learning while listening lol
As a former paralegal & Bravo junkie, I love this podcast! Both ladies are extremely knowledgeable & are great at fully explaining legal terms/rules to those who may not know. If you are interested in pop culture/Bravo legal cases, I definitely recommend listening 🩷
I love this podcast and admire you both.
However, recently I’ve noticed Cece using “uptalk” ( ending a declarative sentence sounding like a question). Maybe she did it before, but I’m just noticing it. Please STOP
I’ve tried to listen several times, but have a hard time believing that you’re attorneys. Your lack of vocabulary and knowledge of proper word usage is staggering. “Incringing” on a copyright?! Sadly, this wasn’t a one-time error.
Oh my god. This cohost can’t possibly be an attorney in real life. That court scene with Phaedra “representing” Sheree was all for show. In what world would a court allow a camera up that close and personal in side conversations etc? Matter in fact, I challenge you to find the actual paperwork in the court of Phaedra representing Sheree. Not only did Sheree and Phaedra both admitted it wasn’t real Bob did also. . Maybe you should read straightfromthea (who actually dated Bob Whitfield l) and get the facts before assuming just because it was on tv it must be true. And you two are attorneys? Scary.
I rarely take the time to write a review but I felt compelled after hearing a few episodes of this podcast. They literally read what they want to say and it sounds robotic in addition to them not being able to pronounce many words. Even their voices get shaky. It’s like a first grade reading class
I like these ladies, they explain clearly and thoroughly. I look forward to their podcast weekly. Keep going, you guys got something great going here. All the best 🤍
Love this show & have mad respect for these ladies & all the work that they put into it. I know that this is totally going to sound like a troll comment, but honestly that is not my intent. However, my ONE and ONLY critique is that Angela literally laughs midway through a 1/3 of all her sentences! Its so frustrating and almost unbearable to listen to! Nothing she *laughs* at is ever funny. I can’t be the only person that finds this annoying & distracting to listen to. Other than that, I really do love this podcast & find it fascinating.
Just listened to maybe the first "legal brief," and I have to say it's a tough sell to get through 4+ minutes of ads on an episode that's 13 minutes long, inclusive of those ads.
Maybe pare it down to one on the quick ones?
Crazy listening to the Chrisley episode knowing our president and his son and many other well known politicians on both sides are guilty of the same and similar acts.
Incredible podcast
So interesting
Loved when John was on!
I love your podcast! I was a true crime podcast junkie but became burnt out on hearing about violence. I just loved the legal aspect of it and hearing all the small details that made up the case. This podcast is the perfect solution for me! Legal details about ridiculous Bravo people. Thank you, ladies!
Cesie is self very admittedly unprepared and unaware. This podcast would be better without her and her biased bravo fan girl opinions. I want to hear a “20/20” style, just the facts, legal bravo podcast.
